processes should be a (pro)grammatic module of an advanced language.
imagine processes as systematic forces bringing about change beyond/beneath individual human scales of comprehension.
processes are not descriptors that are associated with the object being observed, they are the system itself. the name of the system is merely a tag for discovering all relevant processes.
processes are not simply subjects being observed for the purposes of later description... the observers themselves are part of the process of self-discovery of their relationships to each other and their environment.
processes are not concepts or metaphors, they are the prime cause and never-ending effect.
processes are a one-word demolition of the notion of ceteris paribus. fuck that noise, conditions are always dynamic, there is no value in that idiotic hypothetical.
processes are not the object of communication, they are the reason and the enabler. our superpower is designing processes that accelerate or slow down other processes, if not inventing entirely new processes.
processes are as essential as nouns. they are as tangible as verbs. that's why I think "processes" should be an explicit design pattern for an advanced language.
